{"id":90,"date":"2013-10-04T07:38:06","date_gmt":"2013-10-04T11:38:06","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.libertyunionparty.org\/?p=90"},"modified":"2013-10-16T11:59:33","modified_gmt":"2013-10-16T15:59:33","slug":"it-will-take-a-movement-to-stop-the-f-35","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/greenmountainpeaceandjusticeparty.org\/?p=90","title":{"rendered":"It Will Take a Movement to Stop the F-35 (Adopted by the Liberty Union Party and Brattleboro local of Socialist Party USA)"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>It Will Take a Movement to Stop the F-35<\/p>\n<p>by Matthew Andrews<br \/>\nVermont is a rural state, mostly known for its cheese, ice cream, and<br \/>\nwinter skiing. It&#8217;s also widely regarded as one of the most liberal<br \/>\nstates in the country. But like the rest of the United States, Vermont&#8217;s<br \/>\neconomy is heavily driven by military spending. Even in Vermont, money<br \/>\ntalks. So when the Air Force proposed stationing their new F-35 war<br \/>\nplanes at Burlington Airport, politicians lined up to support it and the<br \/>\ncommunity has been deeply divided.<\/p>\n<p>The Burlington Airport in Vermont buttresses the state&#8217;s most populated<br \/>\ntowns. It currently hosts the State&#8217;s National Guard and F-16 airplanes.<br \/>\nDespite having no enemies to fight, these war planes engage in training<br \/>\nexercises on a daily basis. The noise they generate is more than a<br \/>\nnuisance. An estimated 200 homes have been abandoned since 2008 in the<br \/>\nsurrounding communities of South Burlington, Winooski, and Williston.<br \/>\nThe new F-35 war planes will be four times louder. This noise would make<br \/>\n3,400 homes \u201cnot suitable for residential use\u201d according to the Air<br \/>\nForce&#8217;s own analysis. We should not be surprised that the same<br \/>\ngovernment that builds such deadly weapons is also willing to callously<br \/>\ndisplace our communities.<\/p>\n<p>A lively resistance has sprung up within the affected communities. A<br \/>\nvariety of tactics are being used to educate the public of the impact<br \/>\nthese war planes would have, to lobby the air force and politicians to<br \/>\nreconsider, and take legal action. This past July, several hundred<br \/>\npeople rallied and marched to voice popular opposition to the proposed<br \/>\nproject. While many local community members worried about the health<br \/>\naffects of noise exposure, and the impact on property values, there was<br \/>\nalso a vocal contingent led at least in part by the International<br \/>\nSocialist Organization and members of Occupy to oppose the F-35 from an<br \/>\nanti-war position. The march visited the offices of the entire Vermont<br \/>\ncongressional delegation &#8211; one by one &#8211; to shame them and challenge<br \/>\ntheir support. Demonstrators also called on Burlington&#8217;s City Council,<br \/>\nwhich owns the land, to exercise their power to reject the project.<\/p>\n<p>This burgeoning community struggle must expand with the support of<br \/>\nallies throughout the state and country to avoid being steam-rolled by<br \/>\nthe Military-Congressional-Industrial Complex and its local surrogates.<br \/>\nIndeed, the entire congressional delegation from Vermont, as well as the<br \/>\ngovernor, and mayor of Burlington have lined up to support the project.<br \/>\nThey have said the F-35 is inevitable. Even the nominally independent<br \/>\nSenator Bernie Sanders has said on Vermont Public Radio that the F-35s<br \/>\nare going to be built anyway, so Vermont ought to host them in order to<br \/>\ncreate jobs. Sanders says they are necessary for the Vermont Guard to<br \/>\ncontinue its mission. Vermont politicians are happy to pose as<br \/>\nprogressives in order to please a liberal constituency, yet too often we<br \/>\nfail to challenge them when they help themselves to slice after slice of<br \/>\nthe bloated war budget.<\/p>\n<p>The F-35 is the Pentagon&#8217;s most expensive project. The New York Times<br \/>\nreports that they intend to spend as much as $396 billion to buy 2,456<br \/>\nof the F-35 war planes by the late 2030s. Massive projects like this<br \/>\nwill not be stopped by small communities surrounding airports. These<br \/>\ncommunities, however, may be the leading edge of a revived peace<br \/>\nmovement if they tap into popular dissatisfaction over government waste,<br \/>\na lagging economy, and senseless warfare.<\/p>\n<p>The anti-war movement sprang into high gear when it looked like Obama<br \/>\nwas going to bomb Syria. But we also need to engage the slow movement<br \/>\nbuilding struggles that connect our more abstract anti-war ideals to<br \/>\nreal policy decisions being made at home. For those of us outside the<br \/>\nimpact zone, this is our best opportunity to take a bite out war<br \/>\nhysteria, interventionism, and the tax-funded war economy.<\/p>\n<p>The mantra of job creation is trumpeted to silence debate over the<br \/>\nwisdom of having a war economy. We should remind those who are swayed by<br \/>\nthis argument why we want jobs in the first place. Jobs allow people to<br \/>\nraise their standard of living and spend money locally, subsequently<br \/>\nbenefiting the local economy. This can be accomplished by any program<br \/>\nthat spends in a particular community. The second benefit of job<br \/>\ncreation is that workers produce goods and services that contribute to a<br \/>\nhigher standard of living. Military spending fails on both counts. It&#8217;s<br \/>\nhard to dispute that little of our military spending has anything to do<br \/>\nwith keeping us safe. But even on the matter of job creation itself,<br \/>\nmilitary spending measures up the worst among possible options according<br \/>\nto a recent report from the Political Economy Research Institute (PERI)<br \/>\nat the University of Massachusetts in Amherst. According to 2009<br \/>\nnumbers, PERI found that $1 billion spent by the military creates 11,200<br \/>\njobs, versus 16,800 by clean energy development, 17,200 by health care,<br \/>\nor 26,700 by public education. Even increasing consumer demand through<br \/>\ntax cuts would lead to 35% more job creation than military spending.<br \/>\nDespite the public rhetoric about job creation and security, the<br \/>\npowerful forces have their own motivations for basing the F-35 in<br \/>\nVermont. Following the money trail gives us a much more accurate<br \/>\nunderstanding of the real motivations. If the project moves forward,<br \/>\ndevelopers may be the biggest winners. The City of Burlington already<br \/>\nreceived a $40 million Federal grant to buy out local residents affected<br \/>\nby the F-16. This program must multiply to make way for the louder F-35.<br \/>\nWhile this land may be ruled unsuitable for residential use by the FAA,<br \/>\nit can still be zoned for commercial and industrial use. The Boston<br \/>\nGlobe cites an unnamed Pentagon official who says that the<br \/>\nbase-selection process was deliberately &#8220;fudged&#8221; by military brass so<br \/>\nthat Leahy&#8217;s home state would win.<\/p>\n<p>The next confrontation over this debate will be Monday, October 7th at<br \/>\nthe Burlington City Council. Four Progressive Party members will propose<br \/>\na resolution to oppose the F-35. As the land owner, the Burlington City<br \/>\nCouncil could prohibit their tenant, the Air National Guard, from<br \/>\noperating the war planes. The other members of the 14 member council<br \/>\nhowever have not yet broken ranks with the project and its boosters,<br \/>\nincluding Mayor Miro Weinberger and groups like the Greater Burlington<br \/>\nIndustrial Corporation.<\/p>\n<p>We can expect most of the debate on October 7th to be about the risks<br \/>\nposed to the 1443 homes in the crash zone, or the 3410 residential units<br \/>\nprojected to be caught in the high-noise contours of the jets. These<br \/>\nliabilities could have a direct financial impact on the city, which<br \/>\nseems to be the only consideration these politicians are ready to<br \/>\nconsider.<\/p>\n<p>Groups like the ISO, Occupy, the Progressive Party, and Liberty Union<br \/>\nParty are beginning to challenge the militaristic perspective of our<br \/>\nelected officials. We do not see a world full of enemies that must be<br \/>\ndominated by ever superior military might. The United States needs to<br \/>\nquickly convert from an economy that is addicted to war to one that<br \/>\nsustains the Earth and the needs of all people. There are more than<br \/>\nenough jobs and plenty of security to be found in these more noble<br \/>\nexpenditures. The struggle to stop the F-35 in Vermont can only be won<br \/>\nif we build a statewide movement to reject it. Furthermore, only a<br \/>\nnationwide peace movement has the potential to ensure these planes are<br \/>\nnever built and never drop bombs over places like Syria, Yemen, Iraq or<br \/>\nAfghanistan. And finally, only an independent political movement can<br \/>\npromise to rescue our tax dollars from the war machine and invest them<br \/>\nback into our communities.<\/p>\n<p>The race for superior weaponry has been pursued, and largely<br \/>\naccomplished, by the United States government. Not only has it failed to<br \/>\nmake us safer from terrorism, but it has led to endless warfare. We have<br \/>\nsacrificed the world&#8217;s natural resources and beauty, as well as our<br \/>\nnation&#8217;s blood and treasure, only to enrich a tiny corporate elite.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>It Will Take a Movement to Stop the F-35 by Matthew Andrews Vermont is a rural state, mostly known for its cheese, ice cream, and winter skiing. It&#8217;s also widely [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[4,18],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-90","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-issues","category-party-documents"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/greenmountainpeaceandjusticeparty.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/90","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/greenmountainpeaceandjusticeparty.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/greenmountainpeaceandjusticeparty.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/greenmountainpeaceandjusticeparty.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/greenmountainpeaceandjusticeparty.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=90"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/greenmountainpeaceandjusticeparty.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/90\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/greenmountainpeaceandjusticeparty.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=90"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/greenmountainpeaceandjusticeparty.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=90"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/greenmountainpeaceandjusticeparty.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=90"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}